Opus Performance Archives - opusbiological.com
Mounjaro, Ozempic and Wegovy: Evidence, Access and Rising Costs

Mounjaro, Ozempic and Wegovy: Evidence, Access and Rising Costs

Dr David Porter

Medications such as Mounjaro (tirzepatide), Ozempic (semaglutide) and Wegovy (semaglutide) are reshaping the way we think about obesity management. Once reserved for type 2 diabetes, these treatments are now recommended under strict clinical guidelines to support weight loss and reduce health risks.

But as demand has soared, private sector prices have risen sharply, raising important questions about access, equity and long-term sustainability.

The evidence

Both semaglutide and tirzepatide are part of a class of drugs called GLP-1 receptor agonists (tirzepatide also targets GIP receptors). They work by reducing appetite, slowing gastric emptying, and improving blood sugar control.

  • In the STEP programme, patients taking semaglutide (Wegovy) lost an average of 15% of body weight over 68 weeks, alongside lifestyle interventions.
  • In the SURMOUNT-1 trial, tirzepatide (Mounjaro) achieved weight loss of up to 21% of body weight.

These results are unmatched by lifestyle change alone and have been shown to improve cardiovascular risk factors such as blood pressure, cholesterol and glucose regulation.

The price of progress

As clinical success stories have grown, so too has demand. Shortages and supply constraints have driven significant private price increases, leading some patients to switch from Mounjaro to Wegovy on cost grounds rather than medical suitability.

This trend underscores two issues:

  • Affordability: Higher prices risk creating a divide in access between those who can and cannot afford private prescriptions.

     

  • Prioritisation: With limited supply, these medicines must be reserved for patients who meet clinical criteria, rather than for casual or cosmetic use.

Access in the UK

On the NHS, semaglutide (Wegovy) can be prescribed for adults with obesity (BMI ≥35 plus weight-related conditions, or BMI 30–34.9 under specialist referral). For higher-risk ethnic groups, eligibility may begin at BMI 27.5. Treatment is time-limited to two years and must be delivered alongside lifestyle and behavioural support.

Mounjaro is licensed in the UK for type 2 diabetes, with its use for obesity under active NICE review.

The Opus approach

Our Body Optimisation service takes a comprehensive, evidence-led approach to health and performance. Where indicated, GLP-1 medications such as Wegovy or Mounjaro may form part of an individualised programme. Crucially, these medicines are never used in isolation, they are prescribed only after thorough medical assessment, and always as part of a plan that includes nutrition, physical activity and ongoing clinical supervision.

This ensures safety, maximises results, and supports long-term change well beyond the treatment period.

The clinical evidence for Mounjaro, Ozempic and Wegovy is strong. In carefully selected patients, these medications can deliver substantial and sustained weight loss, reduce cardiovascular risk factors, and improve overall health outcomes in ways that lifestyle changes alone often cannot achieve. Large-scale trials consistently demonstrate their effectiveness, with results showing average weight reductions of 15–21% when used under medical supervision alongside diet and activity interventions.

However, the recent rise in private costs highlights a growing challenge. These treatments are powerful tools, but they must remain accessible to those who meet the clinical criteria and stand to benefit most. Prescribing must always be guided by thorough assessment, safety monitoring, and integration into a holistic plan that prioritises long-term health rather than short-term results.

As demand continues to increase, the focus must remain on responsible, evidence-based use, ensuring that patients receive safe, regulated care and that these medicines are recognised not as shortcuts, but as part of a broader medical approach to managing obesity and its associated risks.

Calcific Tendinitis of the Rotator Cuff (CTRC)

Calcific Tendinitis of the Rotator Cuff (CTRC)

Calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff (CTRC) is the accumulation of calcium phosphate within a tendon and is often chronic and recurrent. The majority of CTRC cases are located within 1–2 cm of the insertion of the supraspinatus, leading to a restricted range of motion in the shoulder and potentially causing severe pain (Maja et al., 2023). Interestingly, CTRC commonly occurs between the ages of 30 and 50 and is twice as likely to affect women (Kim et al., 2020). There are two proposed theories regarding the formation of CTRC: the degenerative theory and the reactive theory. The degenerative theory suggests that age-related changes in the tendon lead to a reduction in blood vessel distribution. This results in a hypoxic environment, causing necrosis and/or tendon tearing, which can subsequently lead to calcification (Kim et al., 2020). The reactive theory, on the other hand, describes three phases of calcification: the precalcific phase, the calcific phase, and the post-calcific phase. The precalcific phase involves the ‘transformation of the tendon into fibrocartilaginous tissue’ (Maja et al., 2023), facilitating calcium deposition. The calcific phase is when the actual deposition of calcium occurs, while the post-calcific phase involves the remodelling of the tendon around the calcium deposit. However, neither theory has been definitively proven (Maja et al., 2023). Secondary complications such as bursitis and synovitis are common in CTRC due to the chemical irritation caused by calcium deposits. Treatment for CTRC can be either conservative or surgical. Conservative management has a success rate of 30–80%. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) provide effective pain relief, and corticosteroid injections are beneficial during the resorptive phase. Barbotage has been shown to relieve pain in 70% of patients due to its decompression effects. Ultrasound therapy has also been found to improve quality of life and pain relief; however, it requires regular attendance over a six-week period. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has the highest success rate for chronic calcific tendinitis and achieves results comparable to surgery (Kim et al., 2020). ESWT is effective in improving function and reducing pain, with greater efficacy when combined with physiotherapy (Maja et al., 2023). Therefore, conservative treatment should be prioritised and implemented for at least six months before considering surgical intervention (Maja et al., 2023). If you are experiencing symptoms of calcific tendinitis, it is important to seek professional medical advice. Booking an appointment with sports medicine doctor Dr David Porter (link to bio) can help you explore a range of treatment options tailored to your specific condition. Early intervention and expert guidance can significantly improve your recovery and long-term shoulder health.

Reference List

Kim, M.-S., Kim, I.-W., Lee, S. and Shin, S.-J. (2020). Diagnosis and treatment of calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow, [online] 23(4), pp.203–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2020.00318. Маја Manoleva, Erieta Nikolic Dimitrova, Koevska, V., Biljana Mitrevska, Marija Gocevska Gjerakaroska, Cvetanka Savevska, Biljana Kalchovska Ivanovska, Lidija Stojanoska Matjanoska, Gecevska, D., Jugova, T. and Liljana Malinovska Nikolovska (2023). Comparison of Immediate Effects of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy and Conventional Physical Therapy in Patients with Calcific Tendinitis of the Shoulder Rotator Cuff. Academic Medical Journal, 3(1), pp.99–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.53582/amj2331099m.
A New Approach to Managing Osteoarthritis: The Role of Stem Cell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine

A New Approach to Managing Osteoarthritis: The Role of Stem Cell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine

Understanding Osteoarthritis and Its Impact

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common joint conditions, affecting millions of people worldwide. It develops when the protective cartilage that cushions the joints gradually wears away, leading to pain, stiffness, and reduced mobility. Over time, the condition can significantly impact daily activities, making tasks such as walking, climbing stairs, or even getting out of bed challenging.

Traditional treatments for OA include pain relief medications, physiotherapy , steroid injections, and, in severe cases, joint replacement surgery. While these treatments help manage symptoms, they do not address the underlying cause, cartilage loss. This has led to growing interest in regenerative medicine, an emerging field focused on helping the body repair itself.

One area of regenerative medicine that has gained attention in recent years is stem cell therapy . Although this treatment is still undergoing research and development, early findings suggest it may offer a new approach to joint health by supporting tissue repair and reducing inflammation.

What Are Stem Cells?

Stem cells are special types of cells that have the potential to develop into different cell types in the body. This ability makes them important for healing and regeneration. The human body contains various types of stem cells, but mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are of particular interest when it comes to joint health.

MSCs can be obtained from several sources, including:

  • Bone marrow (from inside bones)
  • Adipose tissue (fat cells)
  • Umbilical cord tissue (from donated umbilical cords after birth)

Among these, umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UC-MSCs) have been widely studied for their potential role in joint repair.

How Can Stem Cells Help in Osteoarthritis?

While osteoarthritis is typically considered irreversible, ongoing research is exploring how stem cells might help slow its progression, reduce symptoms, and potentially support cartilage repair.

The Role of UC-MSCs in Joint Health

Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) are being studied for their ability to:

  • Reduce inflammation in the joint – Inflammation plays a key role in osteoarthritis and contributes to pain and stiffness.
  • Support cartilage maintenance – While research is ongoing, UC-MSCs are believed to release factors that encourage cartilage cells to survive and function.
  • Improve joint lubrication – UC-MSCs may help enhance the quality of synovial fluid, the natural lubricant in joints, improving movement.
  • Modulate the immune system – Osteoarthritis has been linked to immune system activity. UC-MSCs have the potential to balance immune responses in the joint.

Research into UC-MSCs is still ongoing, and while early results are promising, more studies are needed to determine their long-term effects and optimal use.

What Does the Latest Research Say?

Over the past few years, several studies have explored the potential of umbilical cord-derived stem cells in osteoarthritis treatment. Some notable findings include:

  1. Potential for Knee Cartilage Repair
    A review published in Medicine (2025) examined the use of UC-MSCs for knee osteoarthritis. The study found that these cells may contribute to reduced pain, improved function, and potential cartilage preservation. (Liao et al., 2025).
    📄 Read More: LWW Journal
  2. Stem Cell-Based Hydrogels for Cartilage Support
    A study in ACS Biomaterials Science (2025) investigated biodegradable hydrogels combined with UC-MSCs to enhance cartilage repair. The findings suggested improved joint function and reduced inflammation. (Ghosal et al., 2025).
    📄 Read More: ACS Publications
  3. Exosome Therapy for Osteoarthritis
    Scientists are also studying exosomes—tiny particles released by UC-MSCs – which may have anti-inflammatory and regenerative effects. A study in Advanced Functional Materials (2025) showed that exosomes from UC-MSCs supported cartilage repair and joint function in osteoarthritis models. (Lv et al., 2025).
    📄 Read More: Wiley Online Library
  4. UC-MSCs and Joint Injections
    Clinical trials published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy (2025) evaluated the safety and effects of UC-MSC injections for knee OA. The study noted improvements in pain, mobility, and joint function after six months. (Lei et al., 2025).
    📄 Read More: Springer

These studies represent a growing body of research exploring how stem cells may contribute to joint health and osteoarthritis management.

Important Considerations

While the idea of regenerative treatments for osteoarthritis is exciting, there are a few important points to keep in mind:

1. Research is Ongoing

Stem cell treatments, including those using umbilical cord-derived stem cells, are still being researched. Scientists continue to investigate their effectiveness, best application methods, and long-term safety.

2. Treatments Are Not Yet Widely Approved

While some countries have introduced regenerative medicine into clinical practice, regulatory authorities such as the UK’s MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) are still assessing these treatments. Opus, unlike many other clinics, is the UKs only licenced and regulated provider. It is essential to stay informed and seek advice from medical professionals before considering any new treatment options.

3. Every Patient is Different

Osteoarthritis can vary widely between individuals, meaning that treatment responses may differ. What works for one person may not work in the same way for another.

4. A Holistic Approach is Best

Stem cell therapy, if proven to be effective in the future, is unlikely to be a standalone cure for osteoarthritis. It is always best considered alongside other approaches such as:

  • Maintaining a healthy weight to reduce joint strain.
  • Engaging in regular, low-impact exercise (such as swimming or cycling).
  • Using joint-friendly supplements (such as glucosamine and omega-3 fatty acids).
  • Following a balanced diet to support joint health.

 

The Future of Regenerative Medicine

Research into umbilical cord-derived stem cells for osteoarthritis is advancing rapidly, with promising early results. Scientists are also exploring combination therapies, including:

  • Stem cells with growth factors to enhance repair.
  • 3D-printed cartilage scaffolds to create personalised joint implants.
  • Gene editing to enhance stem cell performance.

As research continues, the goal is to develop treatments that not only relieve symptoms but also support the long-term health of joints.

Conclusion

Osteoarthritis remains a challenging condition, but advances in stem cell research and regenerative medicine are opening up new possibilities. While umbilical cord-derived stem cells are still being studied, they hold promise as a potential tool for reducing inflammation, supporting joint function, and promoting cartilage health.

For now, education and staying informed about scientific advancements are key. As more research emerges, individuals seeking alternative approaches to joint care will have a better understanding of the options available.

If you are considering different ways to manage osteoarthritis, always consult a healthcare professional for personalised advice.

 

References

  1. Liao, Z.K. et al. (2025). Clinical research progress of umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells in knee articular cartilage repair. Medicine.
    📄 Read More
  2. Lei, J. et al. (2025). Therapeutic efficacy of intra-articular injection of UC-MSCs in knee OA. Stem Cell Research & Therapy.
    📄 Read More

 

Osteoarthritis

The Role of Compression Therapy in Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy

The Role of Compression Therapy in Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy

Compression therapy is a widely used technique in musculoskeletal physiotherapy, offering benefits for both recovery and performance enhancement. It involves the application of controlled pressure to muscles, joints, or soft tissues using compression devices such as the Therabody Jet Boots we use here at OPUS. pneumatic compression pumps.

This therapy has been extensively utilised in injury management, post-surgical rehabilitation, and athletic performance optimisation. We are all well accustomed to seeing Premier League players posting the routine image of them with their feet up, in a set of these boots, watching the La Liga late kick off following their Saturday afternoon match. So there must be a reason why!

Compression Therapy

Mechanism of Action

Compression therapy works by enhancing circulation, reducing swelling, and promoting tissue healing. The applied pressure assists venous return, helping deoxygenated blood and metabolic waste products move back toward the heart more efficiently.

This improved circulation delivers oxygen-rich blood and essential nutrients to tissues, facilitating faster repair and reducing inflammation. Additionally, compression can support the lymphatic system, helping to prevent fluid accumulation in injured or overworked tissues.

Benefits for Recovery

  1. Reduction of Swelling and Inflammation One of the primary benefits of compression therapy is its ability to minimize swelling, a common symptom in musculoskeletal injuries such as sprains, strains, and post-surgical recovery. By applying pressure, excess fluid is prevented from accumulating in the injured area, reducing discomfort and expediting the healing process (Priego-Quesada et al., 2020).
  2. Pain ManagementCompression garments and bandages provide gentle pressure that can reduce pain by limiting excessive movement and stabilizing the affected area. This can be particularly beneficial for individuals recovering from ligament injuries, fractures, or joint surgeries, such as ACL reconstruction or total knee replacements (Born et al., 2013).
  3. Improved Muscle Oxygenation and Tissue HealingEnhanced blood flow through compression ensures an increased supply of oxygen and essential nutrients to the affected muscles and joints. This accelerates tissue regeneration, which is crucial in conditions such as tendinopathies and muscle tears. Faster healing times can reduce the risk of chronic issues and long-term disability (MacRae et al., 2012).
  4. Prevention of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)For individuals undergoing prolonged immobilization following musculoskeletal injuries or surgeries, compression therapy can help prevent deep vein thrombosis. By promoting circulation in the lower limbs, it reduces the risk of blood clot formation, a serious complication in post-surgical patients (Brophy-Williams et al., 2017).

Benefits for Performance

  1. Enhanced Muscle Recovery Athletes and active individuals use compression therapy to recover faster after intense training sessions. Compression garments aid in reducing muscle soreness and fatigue by clearing metabolic waste, such as lactic acid, from the muscles more efficiently (Houghton et al., 2019).
  2. Improved Proprioception and Stability Compression sleeves and supports provide sensory feedback, improving proprioception—the body’s awareness of joint position and movement. This can be beneficial for injury prevention, as better joint stability reduces the risk of excessive strain and misalignment (Duffield et al., 2010).
  3. Reduced Muscle Oscillation and Fatigue During high-impact activities such as running or jumping, muscles experience micro-vibrations that contribute to fatigue. Compression gear minimizes these oscillations, reducing muscle fatigue and improving endurance over prolonged periods of activity (Hill et al., 2014).

Conclusion

Compression therapy can be a useful tool in musculoskeletal physiotherapy, aiding in both recovery and performance. Its ability to reduce swelling, alleviate pain, and enhance circulation makes it a valuable tool in injury management and rehabilitation.

Additionally, athletes and active individuals benefit from its performance-enhancing effects, including faster muscle recovery and improved stability. Whether used for acute injury management or long-term athletic optimisation, compression therapy remains an effective and accessible treatment modality in physiotherapy practice.

References

  • Born, D., Sperlich, B., & Holmberg, H. C. (2013). Bringing light into the dark: effects of compression clothing on performance and recovery. Sports Medicine, 43(6), 533-549.
  • Brophy-Williams, N., Driller, M. W., & Shing, C. M. (2017). Acute and chronic effects of compression garments on recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 20(6), 527-531.
  • Duffield, R., Cannon, J., & King, M. (2010). The effects of compression garments on recovery of muscle performance following high-intensity sprint and plyometric exercise. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 13(1), 136-140.
  • Hill, J., Howatson, G., van Someren, K. A., & Gaze, D. C. (2014). The influence of compression garments on physiological and performance responses to exercise: a systematic review. Sports Medicine, 44(6), 791-803.
  • Houghton, L. A., Dawson, B., & Maloney, S. K. (2019). Effects of compression garments on recovery following exercise: A meta-analysis. Physiology & Behaviour, 210, 112671.
  • MacRae, B. A., Cotter, J. D., & Laing, R. M. (2012). Compression garments and exercise: garment considerations, physiology and performance. Sports Medicine, 42(10), 819-843.
  • Priego-Quesada, J. I., et al. (2020). Effects of compression garments on sports performance and recovery: A systematic review. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(12), 1287-1304.

Biopsychosocial Considerations of Sports Injury and Rehabilitation: A Holistic Approach to Athlete Recovery

Biopsychosocial Considerations of Sports Injury and Rehabilitation: A Holistic Approach to Athlete Recovery

Opus, founded by David Porter, a new perspective on sports injury rehabilitation is taking shape. Together with Professor of psychology Dave Collins and lead physiotherapist Ian Gilham, the team promotes the biopsychosocial (BPS) model—a comprehensive approach that goes beyond treating the physical injury to address the mental and social factors that impact an athlete’s recovery.

This method aims to support athletes fully, enabling them to return to peak performance with resilience.

 

Key Points:

  • Interdisciplinary Teamwork: The BPS model draws on a team of specialists, including doctors, physiotherapists, psychologists, nutritionists, and coaches. This interdisciplinary approach ensures that all aspects of an athlete’s recovery are covered, promoting a more rounded and complete rehabilitation.
  • The Biopsychosocial Model: Traditionally, rehabilitation focuses on the physical aspects of injury. However, the BPS model acknowledges that injuries affect athletes in other ways too, such as their mental health (e.g., anxiety or loss of identity) and social status (e.g., their role within the team). The model addresses these factors together for a holistic recovery.

  • Patient-Centred Care: One of the core principles of the BPS model is putting the athlete at the centre of their care. This patient-centred approach ensures that athletes are actively involved in their recovery process, which can increase motivation and help tailor the rehabilitation to their specific needs.

  • Real-Life Examples: The article shares practical case studies where the BPS model has been effectively applied. In one case, a competitive equestrian rider with a severe pelvic injury received coordinated care involving medical, psychological, and social support, which helped her overcome fears about returning to competition.

  • Rehabilitation Stages: Recovery under the BPS model follows a clear, structured path, with each phase of rehabilitation managed by the interdisciplinary team. Early stages focus on reassurance and stabilisation, while later stages incorporate goal-setting to keep the athlete motivated and engaged.

  • Social Support: The social aspect of recovery is vital for maintaining mental wellbeing. The BPS model encourages athletes to remain connected with their teams during rehabilitation, helping them feel included and supported throughout the process.

  • Goal Setting and Progress Measurement: Setting clear, achievable goals is central to the BPS model. Breaking the rehabilitation process into manageable steps allows athletes to see progress and stay motivated. Tools like the “Challenge Ladder” help measure this progress, giving athletes a clear path forward.

  • Addressing Psychological Barriers: Injuries often bring psychological challenges, such as fear of reinjury. The BPS model incorporates psychological support to address these fears early on, helping athletes regain their confidence and return to competition without hesitation.

  • Clear Roles for Specialists: With many professionals involved, clear communication is essential. The BPS model establishes well-defined roles for each specialist, doctors, physiotherapists, and coaches, ensuring consistency in care and avoiding confusion for the athlete.

  • A Look to the Future: The authors advocate for broader adoption of the BPS model across sports rehabilitation settings, noting that its holistic approach leads to more effective and complete recovery. This model is particularly beneficial in helping athletes not only return to play but come back stronger, both physically and mentally.

In this article, David Porter, Dave Collins, and Ian Gilham highlight the benefits of the biopsychosocial approach to sports injury rehabilitation.

Focusing on the athlete’s physical, mental, and social well-being, the BPS model provides a more complete path to recovery. Through interdisciplinary collaboration and patient-centred care, this approach ensures that athletes return to their sport stronger and more resilient.

This innovative approach is setting a new standard in sports medicine, helping athletes achieve the best outcomes in their recovery journey. To learn more about how the BPS model can enhance sports injury rehabilitation, read the full article here

 

 

Injuries in paddle

Injuries in paddle

Paddle tennis has increased in popularity over the last few years and due to the fast-nature of the sport, it is unsurprising that musculoskeletal injuries are very common. Paddle takes place on a small field and surrounded by glass which increases the speed of the game. Paddle requires ‘motor anticipation, explosive force, reactive speed (acceleration and deceleration), resistance, flexibility and agility’(Virgolino, 2022). These components of fitness are key for health, wellness and longevity however there is an increased risk of injury if one does not apply appropriate preventative techniques (Virgolino, 2022).

 

Sportsman playing padel game

The most common MSK injuries in senior players include knee sprains, lateral epicondylitis, shoulder pain (20.6%) and lower back pain (27.5%) (Castillo-Lozano, 2017). However, lower back pain is the most prevalent among junior players (Virgolino, 2022). These findings enable practitioners to create preventive strategies and programmes which focus on scapular stability, trunk stability and lower limb strength (Castillo-Lozano, 2017).  Despite the risk of injury, paddle provides many benefits, especially to elderly players. There is a variety of research demonstrating the physical advantages (muscular strength, endurance and reaction time) of paddle, however literature has shown paddle to also provide psychological benefits such as reducing anxiety and stress (Eirale, 2023).

Elbow tendinopathy mostly impacts novice players. This is most likely due to players hitting backhand strokes in wrist flexion, the sudden increase of eccentric loading of forearm extensors and the vibrations impacting the elbow when the ball reaches the racket. Lateral epicondylitis is extremely common due to the repetitive movements and duration of the game (2-4hours). However there have been recent improvements in racket technology which reduce the risk of epicondylitis.  It is also unsurprising that patella tendinopathy often occurs due to repetitive jumping and sudden change in direction. Interestingly, males are 2-4 times more likely to develop patella tendinopathy, whereas females are more likely to experience chondromalacia patellae (Eirale, 2023).

Disc-related lower back pain and facet joint syndrome are predominantly the main cause of lower back pain (LBP) in paddle. Sward et. al found 50% of their participants suffered with LBP and 1/5 experienced severe symptoms. This is likely due to paddle incorporating all ranges of motion in the lumbar spine combined with explosive movements; therefore, it is important to consider trunk stability and lumbar mobility to prevent injury (Eirale, 2023).

Lastly, repetitive movements such as ‘smash’ and ‘bandejas’ cause muscle imbalances in the shoulder, increasing the risk of rotator cuff injuries and scapular instability. Also due to repeated overhead movements, there is a possibility of impingement in the glenoid humeral joint leading to a SLAP lesion. Consequently, rotator cuff strengthening and scapular stability are key to prevent shoulder injuries (Eirale, 2023).

Reference list

Castillo-Lozano, R. (2017). Epidemiology and prevention strategies for the musculoskeletal injuries in the paddle-tennis senior players. Science & Sports, 32(3), pp.e101–e106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scispo.2016.09.009.

Eirale, C. (2023). Aspetar Sports Medicine Journal – INJURIES IN PADEL. [online] Aspetar.com. Available at: https://journal.aspetar.com/en/archive/volume-12-targeted-topic-sports-medicine-in-padel/injuries-in-padel [Accessed 22 Aug. 2024].

Virgolino, M. (2022). Running in Paddle. Springer eBooks, pp.179–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65064-6_19.